Plant parts are designed for specific functions, and root hairs are no exception. Root hairs are specifically designed to provide water and nutrients to the crop plant (Figure 1).
Uptake of nutrients into the plant is completed largely through a process called active transport. With active transport, plant energy is expended to move nutrients from the soil solution across cell membranes in the tiny root hairs pictured. Root hairs are highly specialized to greatly expand the root surface area in order to acquire more water and nutrients.
In contrast, leaves are designed to collect sunlight, photosynthesize, transport sugars to other parts of the plant and transpire water vapor and gases. Leaves are covered by a waxy cuticle, making them virtually impervious to water and carbon dioxide. Stomata make up 10% of the leaf surface and account for 90% of the water and gas movement on the leaf. The football-shaped structures seen below are the stomata (Figure 2).
In order to get nutrients into the leaf, the nutrient must be able to penetrate the waxy cuticle or enter through the stomata and then across cell membranes. It should be noted that very small amounts of inorganic ions (fertilizers) can enter plants through the leaf surface.
Because such small amounts of nutrients can enter plant leaves, macronutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium should not be considered for a 1- or 2-shot foliar feeding program. It is highly improbable that foliar feeding can get enough of these nutrients into the plant to make a difference. In fact, several university studies have confirmed little difference in yield when foliar applying macronutrients to corn and soybeans.
Micronutrients, on the other hand, can prove beneficial as a foliar feed, but only if deficiency symptoms exist (Figure 3 and Figure 4). This is due to the fact that micronutrients are required in such small quantities that even a leaf application will be sufficient to improve the plant's health. Even so, once a field is identified to have a problem with micronutrients, growers should subsequently apply micronutrients in a band with starter fertilizers. This method provides more consistent results than foliar feeding.
Generally, companies marketing foliar feed products advertise low use rates from a quart up to 3 gallons per acre with products that already have a very low analysis. Before purchasing a foliar feed product, consider how much nutrient you are actually putting on your field. Then calculate the cost of the nutrients on a per pound basis. Would the money be better spent on soil-applied nutrients?
Many growers like to apply foliar nutrients while applying herbicides or fungicides to avoid another trip through the field. Consider the following:
There is no substitute for a strong soil fertility program. Plants must have adequate nutrition to maximize yields. Since roots are more efficient at nutrient uptake than leaves, macronutrients (N, P and K) are best applied to the soil. In addition, care should be taken to avoid management practices that would reduce root volume (e.g., compaction).
Micronutrients can be applied to foliage with success. Consider the amount of nutrients you are getting for your dollar in a foliar feed program.